Beyond costs: an international perspective on the healthcare journey and employee experience

The Howden Employee Benefits Report 2026 sheds light on major international trends in Social Protection. After analyzing elements related to the market and its evolution. in our first article, we explore another dimension of the report: how well do social protection systems perform when put to the test in the field?  This article analyzes the factors that influence employee satisfaction with their supplemental health coverage and the parameters employers need to consider in order to create more effective plans that meet these expectations.

 

The care pathway: a major issue of satisfaction

The quality of healthcare coverage is not only about reimbursements. The survey reveals that employee satisfaction fluctuates significantly depending on the stages of the care journey. While 80% of employees overall are satisfied with their initial appointment and diagnosis, this rate drops during the treatment and reimbursement phases. In the Pacific region, where only 6% of employees have waited more than a month for a first appointment, satisfaction reaches 94% for the diagnostic process. Conversely, in Europe, where 21% of employees wait more than a month, satisfaction falls well below the global average.

We have mentioned in our first article the issue of longer waiting times for healthcare, which is more pronounced in Europe than in Asia. The consequences are dramatic: globally, 36% of employees report that their health has deteriorated due to waiting times. In more than half of cases (52%), this deterioration has led to additional sick leave, impacting both company productivity and welfare costs.

The recognized quality of the French public healthcare system contrasts with the reality of medical delays, creating a gap between expectations and actual experience. 59% of French people say they forego care because of the wait time to get an appointment, and 38% because of distance. 
For employers, this gap results in increasing frustration among employees and a perception of decreased value in their benefits.

Un médecin échange avec son patient en salle d'attente

The price of waiting

Faced with these delays, 41% of employees worldwide have had to pay upfront to speed up access to care, even though they had supplementary health insurance. 54% of employees say they have foregone care at least once for financial reasons (compared to 45% in France), including 31% on multiple occasions. 
This situation creates a vicious circle: untreated pathologies worsen, requiring more heavy and costly interventions. Absences lengthen, productivity decreases, and indirect costs skyrocket.
In France, although the healthcare system offers extensive public coverage, out-of-pocket expenses can quickly accumulate, especially for specialist consultations, extra fees, and certain dental or optical procedures. Employees in rural areas or medical deserts are particularly affected.

The increase in chronic diseases concerns employers.

Beyond general medical costs, employers are facing an increase in claims involving serious and long-term illnesses requiring ongoing and costly care. This is due to several factors: an aging workforce, late diagnoses due to delays in accessing care, and improved treatments that allow for longer periods of care.
Some pathologies stand out particularly:

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)

34% of employers identify MSDs as one of their main cost factors. These include back, neck, and joint pain, which affect all types of workers: office employees hunched over their computers, warehouse staff lifting heavy loads, and sales professionals on their feet all day. 
According to the World Health Organization, lower back pain is the leading cause of premature departure from the labor market. The problem with MSDs is that they are both preventable and difficult to treat once they have developed. Early intervention—workstation ergonomics, physical therapy sessions, tailored exercises—can prevent deterioration that would lead to repeated absences and a lasting impact on the employee's ability to work.

Medecin

Cardiovascular diseases and diabetes

30% of employers rank cardiovascular disease among their main cost factors. High blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, and heart disease are closely linked to lifestyle factors such as poor diet, lack of exercise, smoking, and alcohol consumption. 
The distinctive feature of these diseases is that they develop silently for years before causing a serious event—heart attack, stroke, diabetic complications. Once they manifest, they require ongoing medical monitoring, costly treatments, and often lead to complications.
The challenge for employers is twofold: on one hand, to support employees who are already affected in managing their chronic illness; on the other hand, to invest heavily in prevention to prevent more employees from falling into these pathologies.

Serious illnesses

Beyond common chronic illnesses, companies are facing a worrying increase in cancers and serious illnesses requiring extensive and prolonged treatment. 62% of employers have seen a slight increase in these claims over the past 12 months, and 18% have seen a significant increase. Two factors explain this trend:

1. Late diagnoses: when employees wait too long before seeking medical advice or when screenings are not carried out regularly, certain diseases are discovered at an advanced stage, requiring more intensive and costly treatment. 

2. The aging of the active population: with the increase in the retirement age, companies have more employees in age groups where the risk of serious illnesses increases.

These claims represent a significant financial burden, but also a human challenge for the teams involved. Their management requires a specific approach: personalized support, coordination between the various healthcare actors, and often, reflection on the modalities of return to work. In France, this trend should also intensify as life expectancy continues to increase and the proportion of senior employees in companies is growing. Employers must anticipate these changes in their financing strategy to protect themselves from these costly claims.

couple âgé regarde par la fenêtre

A wide gap in the perception of value

One of the most striking findings of the report is the gap between employers' perception and employees' experience. 90% of employers believe that their health insurance meets the needs of their employees, and 86% believe they are getting a good quality/price ratio. However, 25% of employees do not feel supported by their company in terms of health.

How to explain this gap?

Employers focus primarily on the characteristics of the contract (the scope of coverage, the amount of contributions, the number of services offered), while employees evaluate their experience in the field (ease of access, speed of care, simplicity of procedures, quality of support).
This is the case in France, where this discrepancy is amplified by the complexity of the system (the relationship between social security, supplementary insurance, and supplemental insurance is not always clear) and the lack of communication about actual coverage. An employee who does not understand what is covered, or who has to manage out-of-pocket expenses despite having “good” coverage, will have difficulty perceiving the value of their contract.

Strategic recommendations: our action levers

Faced with these findings, we identify priority areas to improve the employee experience:

1. Simplifying access to healthcare

Your supplementary contract includes health services useful for your employees on a daily basis (teleconsultation, health assistance and insurance, etc.). They provide an effective response to the issues of delays and costs mentioned above. Offering a network of care will also allow them to reduce their out-of-pocket expenses and find healthcare professionals near their homes.

2. Implement a prevention program

Prevention programs, although numerous, remain underutilized in companies. Encourage screenings, early interventions, but also access to tools to take care of one's mental health. If a condition is detected early, its cost will be contained and its consequences will disrupt the organization less.

Align guarantees with real risks.

Use claims data to align social protection expenses with the real needs of your company. This may involve strengthening certain guarantees (optical, dental, alternative medicine) while optimizing other less used items. To identify key items, it is best to consult a broker to analyze your income statement and optimize your guarantees.

4. Ensure confidentiality and build trust.

Communicate clearly about the management of personal health data so that employees feel secure when using these services, particularly mental health services. In France, compliance with the GDPR and the strict separation between the employer and the insurance company are essential guarantees that must be regularly reiterated.
 

Towards an approach focused on employees.

The message of the report is clear: effective health plans are not necessarily the most expensive or comprehensive ones on paper. They are the ones that really work for employees—simple, fast, understandable, and tailored to their needs.
The organizations that will succeed in the coming years are those that place people at the center of their social protection strategy. Those that measure satisfaction as much as costs, that invest in prevention as much as in cure. In sumamry, those who consider health as a strategic investment in human capital and not as a burden to minimize.
In France, where attachment to the solidarity-based healthcare system remains strong, this approach resonates particularly well. It involves moving beyond purely financial debates to build systems that truly support employees when they need it most.  It is on this condition that social protection will make sense: to protect, support, and restore confidence.

Rapport EB 2026

Pour plus d'informations, téléchargez le rapport

The changing face of global employee health