Letter writing for claims – hints and tips

Get claims letters right first time with our concise, experience‑led tips and advice - written in partnership with Kennedys

An integral role in dealing with claims against your firm is responding to correspondence that you have received.

Whilst Insurers are there to assist and guide you, under the terms of your policy you are required to provide full co-operation and assistance with the investigation, defence, settlement, or mitigation of any actual or potential claim. Insurers will therefore often request that letters are drafted by you. Whilst this can be time consuming, it helps you to retain control over correspondence and the relationship with your client as sometimes Insurers’ drafting may not be the most appropriate as you know the situation best.

To assist you in getting this right first time, we have pulled together some hints, tips and advice based on our experience of reviewing and discussing draft responses with Insurers to try and hit the nail on the head with the first draft.

Hints & tips for claims letter writing

  • Do give yourself enough time to draft a suitable response and also try to allow time for Insurers to consider this.
  • As far as possible, respond in a timely fashion to avoid the matter escalating and the possibility of criticism from your regulators. 
  • Do stick to the facts as much as possible. It is best to avoid using emotive language and try to refrain from sending overly detailed responses unless it is essential, as this can encourage unnecessarily lengthy correspondence that goes beyond the issue in hand.
  • When acknowledging the complaint, set out the timescales contained within your complaints procedure. This will save you being chased by your client and helps manage their expectations. If it becomes clear you cannot make the indicated timeframes, inform the client accordingly.

Do not do the following:

  • Do not make admissions or inferences of acceptance of liability unless previously discussed with your Insurers. 
  • Do not make any offers to settle or indemnify any losses within your letter unless this has been discussed and approved by Insurers.
  • Make sure that you do not send any correspondence without reference to your Insurers. This can open a door for Insurers to take issue with this and in serious cases, reserve their rights under the policy. If you have a tight time frame, please give us a call or mark your email as urgent and we will do all we can to respond quickly and obtain urgent instructions where required. 
  • Do not over complicate matters. As above, stick to the facts to avoid a client’s ability to draw inferences from comments or omissions that were not necessarily required in the response.
  • Do not try and rectify the mistake or make offers to do so without the prior consent of your Insurers. It will not always be appropriate.

Pressure to put it right

If you consider that your firm’s conduct was negligent, care must be taken when attempting to put things right for a client. 

You may be aware of the case of Howell Jones.  In this matter, Howell Jones acted for a husband in divorce proceedings and they did not receive a favourable outcome for him. Howell Jones gave their client the option to put matters right at their own expense (by attempting to have the decision overturned) and advised their client of a cause of action against them and to seek independent advice. The SDT concluded Howell Jones had “not ceased acting when it should have done and this was fairly described as an error of judgment”.  Howell Jones were penalised for this cause of action and the overall cost to the firm and/or Insurers totalled around £150,000.  

There is, of course, a requirement to be open and honest with clients if things go wrong (as per the recent changes to the Code of Conduct). This can include making factual admissions; however, it is best to run this past Insurers first. If you consider there to be a conflict of interest, it will likely be preferable for you to cease acting and advise the client to seek independent legal advice, even if this might not appear to be the most commercially savvy decision to your practice.

Importance of obtaining advice from insurers 

You will of course be aware that there are certain obligations under your Professional Indemnity policy to keep Insurers in the loop and not to undertake any steps which may prejudice Insurers’ position. It is therefore important to ensure that Insurers are taken along for the ride and ‘buy in’ to any strategy that you wish to adopt. Remember, Insurers don’t like surprises!

The risks of not obtaining prior authority from Insurers can be serious. Insurers can reserve their rights under the policy if they would not have agreed to a particular course of action that has been undertaken without their consent. For example, if a letter has already been sent admitting liability but Insurers think the claim could have been defended, they may feel as though their position has been prejudiced. Similarly, Insurers will not be happy if an offer has been made above the policy excess without their consent as they may be committed to settling the claim and paying out before they have had a chance to comment.

What this reservation of rights means for you is that Insurers could seek a reimbursement from you to the extent they feel they have been prejudiced. It is therefore imperative that draft letters are sent to Insurers for their prior approval. Most importantly, it protects your position as Insurers are precluded from later saying that they would have dealt with matters differently, particularly if the position deteriorates.

Practical examples to writing in an insuer friendly way

Now that we have set out some hints and tips and explained the importance of drafting letters, below we have included some practical examples of phrasing things in an Insurer friendly way.

What you are trying to say:Example of how to phrase it:
We accept that we breached our duty as we failed to file the Claim Form in time.The Claim Form was not filed on or before [XX] date.
You do not have a claim as you have not suffered any loss!We cannot properly consider any claim without documentary evidence of any loss.
We told you there was a risk of [XX]As per our correspondence dated [XX] and/or as per the meeting/phone call of [XX], we advised that there was a risk of [XX].
This was my mistake and you may be able to pursue a claim against this firm instead.On the basis of the content of this letter, you may consider it appropriate to obtain independent legal advice.
We cannot come back to you as we are awaiting instructions from our Insurers.We are currently investigating and considering the matter and will revert as soon as we are able.
Given what has happened, we do not want to act for you any further as this could lead to further issues.Unfortunately we are unable to continue to act as it appears that a conflict of interest has arisen.

Always remember that Howden and Insurers are there to assist you in reaching the best possible outcome of any claim/potential claim notified under the policy. Both we and Insurers see these claims on a daily basis so our knowledge and advice is always available - make sure you benefit from this knowledge. It may be, for example, that we/Insurers have successfully defended a similar matter in the past and have a number of helpful arguments that can be suggested to you to incorporate into your draft letter. Or perhaps you know what you want to say but are struggling to particularise this in a letter. It is always helpful to have another pair of eyes to provide extra guidance.

As we have touched on above, if timing is an issue, please let us know. It can be easy to be put off running a draft letter past Insurers if there is an urgency to respond. However, for the reasons mentioned in this article, we would caution against this. Instead, flag the urgency with us and we can expedite the matter with Insurers. 

Please also bear in mind that some Insurers use third party claims handlers who may be able to prepare draft letters on your behalf. Please contact us find out more about your specific claims handling arrangements. 

Ultimately, please remember that we are all on the same side so there is no downside in seeking guidance from us and/or Insurers. We would encourage you to make the most out of your policy and both we and Insurers fully appreciate that you may not be used to dealing with contentious matters on a regular basis, if at all.


Written by:  Nicola Vince, Howden & Chloe Bingham, Kennedys

Nicola Vince

Divisional Director, Claims

Nicola heads up Howden’s solicitors’ claims team in London. She is a qualified lawyer having qualified as a Chartered Legal Executive in 2015.

Nicola specialises in looking after some of our largest law firm clients, both UK based and internationally. She is experienced in dealing with complex claims and coverage disputes and frequently advocates for clients to ensure that they get the most out of their policies.

Nicola joined Howden in 2016 from the professional indemnity claims handling team of a large multinational law firm where she previously dealt with claims on behalf of a number of insurers. Prior to that, Nicola started her career working in other areas of private practice, firstly in residential conveyancing and later moving into civil litigation.

In addition to handling claims, Nicola works closely with our Legal & Technical team and is involved in reviewing and enhancing policy wording.

Photo of Nicola Vince