Insight

SRA consults the legal sector on proposed changes to their fining framework

Published

Read time

RPC Logo

Guest article written by Will Sefton and Victoria Lawman at RPC

First published on RPC's website on 30 July 2024. 

The SRA is conducting a consultation from the 28 June to 20 September 2024 on their proposed changes to the SRA Fining Guidance. The regulator is seeking feedback in response to the new unlimited fining powers granted under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act (ECCTA 2023).

The ECCTA 2023 grants the SRA unlimited fining authority for misconduct related to economic crimes, a significant increase from their previous limit of £25,000. 

Under the current finding guidance, fines are determined based on the nature and impact of the misconduct, categorized into bands A to D, with A capturing the least serious misconduct and the subsequent bands capturing progressively more serious misconduct. The guidance also considers mitigating and aggravating factors separately after identifying an indicative fine. The SRA may reduce an indicative fine by up to 40% for mitigating factors. If the indicative fine exceeds £25,000, the case must be referred to the SDT, which has unlimited fining powers.

The SRA is now contemplating updates to the fining guidance to strengthen the deterrent effect of fines. They have raised concerns that the current guidance lacks clarity and fails to adequately differentiate between conduct that is "intentional, grossly negligent or reckless, continued after it was known to be improper, or formed a pattern of conduct" and conduct without these characteristics. The proposed updates aim to enhance the deterrent impact of fines and increase their punitive nature for serious misconduct.

In summary, the proposals include the following changes: 

  • Introduction of two new penalty bands, E and F. Previously, fines for misconduct under Band D could reach up to 5% of annual domestic turnover. Now, fines for misconduct under Band F could invite an indicative fine ranging from 11% to >25% of annual domestic turnover. The open ended indicative fine in Band F reflects the SRA's new unlimited fining powers and the discretion of decision makers to issue fines as they see fit in the circumstances.
  • Updating the scoring framework that assigns a score based on the nature and impact of misconduct. The cumulative score determines the appropriate penalty band. The SRA proposes updating the framework to include scores for misconduct causing "severe" or "very severe" loss or impact. These higher scores would place such misconduct into the new penalty bands E or F, resulting in significantly more punitive fines.
  • Implementing minimum fines for each penalty band, with a minimum fine of £5,000 for the least serious misconduct in Band A.
  • Enhancing clarity on when the SRA may base fines on metrics other than annual domestic turnover. Currently, fines can be based on global turnover in "exceptional circumstances." The SRA proposes introducing illustrative examples to clarify when this may occur.

Although the SRA's unlimited fining powers are limited to economic crimes, the proposed changes to the fining framework would affect the assessment of all types of misconduct, including non-economic misconduct. The SRA consultation papers reads: 

Many of the cases in Band E and F are likely to be for serious misconduct involving economic crime, although other serious misconduct might also fall into these bands.

According to the consultation paper, such 'other' serious misconduct may include that which jeopardises the public trust in the legal profession, such as misconduct relating to SLAPPs.  Indicative fines identified by the SRA in the higher bands, E and F, could result in recommended fines of over 25% of global revenue. While the SRA will not have the authority to issue these fines in relation to 'other' serious misconduct, they will be able to refer such cases to the SDT. The consultation paper paints a picture of a radically re-imagined enforcement landscape which will no doubt alarm firms across the board.

Howden's Commentary

The potential for the SRA to have increased fining powers is something that many solicitors will want to give their view on, but the timing of the consultation on this issue is disappointing. The consultation period from 28 June to 20 September comes at a busy point in the year for solicitors. It is the time frame when many are trying to complete their PII renewal. They may also have an increased workload as they prepare to go on holiday or cover colleagues who are away – or alternatively are on holiday themselves.

The consultation document runs to nearly 40 pages including the annexes, so even finding the time to read it will be a challenge for many. This article from RPC provides a helpful overview and is a good option to get you started. This is an important issue and as consultations can be something of a numbers game we would urge you to respond to the SRA with your views. Your response does not need to be “War and Peace”. A concise letter summarising your views, concerns and any suggestions or proposals will ensure you have had your say. Alternatively if your local law society is responding, you might want to request a copy of their response and simply submit a letter noting that you have both considered and support it.

At the point of publishing this article there are 3 weeks to go, so there is still time to respond.

Will Sefton, RPC

Will Sefton

Partner and Head of Professional and Financial Risks
RPC

+44 20 3060 6924

Victoria Lawman, RPC

Victoria Lawman

Trainee Solicitor
RPC

+44 20 3060 6000

This article has been written by Will Sefton and Victoria Lawman  of Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP (RPC) and the opinions and views stated in this article are those of Will Sefton and Victoria Lawman and not Howden Insurance Brokers Limited (“Howden”). Howden is an insurance broker and is not authorised or regulated to advise on proposed changes to the SRA fining framework. Howden shall not (i) owe or accept any duty, responsibility or liability to you or any other person; and (ii) be liable in respect of any loss, damage or expense caused by your or any other party’s reliance on this article.